IDEO, one of the world's leading design firms, recently published an article focused on better design in the classroom. Using a human-centered design approach, the firm developed an "investigative learning" approach that makes education less about a transmission of knowledge and rote learning, and more about the creation of an environment that encourages kids to be seekers of knowledge. Some of their recommendations include:
- Create an environment that encourages kids to raise plenty of questions (and that no question is a dumb question, I'd say), because "real learning" occurs when a child is able to reconcile a question s/he is facing.
- Kids should learn by doing and experiencing, with the teacher becoming not the "expert," but rather an enabler of learning and a guide to inform when necessary.
- Educate students to become anthropologists, not archaeologists: whereas the archaeologist seeks to understand the past through the investigation of relics and an understanding of what was, an anthropologist seeks to understand people through a study of values, behaviors, needs and desires. IDEO argues that in order to design solutions for the future, we must learn to understand what it is that people need now, and create around that.
- Create a way to assess AND value skills such creativity, collaboration and empathy because they will be just as important as things like SAT scores or other numerical assessments of academic achievement. These abilities should no longer be referred to as "soft skills" because they are just as critical to being an effective problem solver.
- "Incubate for the future" by highlighting students' role as global citizens. Talk about topics such as poverty or the environment. These can be opportunities to talk about social issues as well as teach topics such as economics or engineering. Even corporations such as Adobe have gotten involved in this movement with the Design Ignites Change project (a collaboration with Worldstudio Projects), which challenges students to tackle social problems by using creative, innovative thinking.
Ugh, I just lost my comment ... I'll try to recap what I said:
ReplyDeleteThere are many, many parents, educators, community members, and advocates who support IDEO's ideas for schools of the future; it's not a new idea. I'm sure many charter schools are based on these principles.
But public education as an institution in this country has a long way to go if it wants to become IDEO's idea of an ideal education. And it's questionable whether it will even move in that direction in the near future.) There are just too many obstacles: funding, government bureaucracy, assessments, and professional development, just to name a few. That's why, I think, there's such a movement towards the alternatives: private schools, charter schools, homeschooling, lab schools, etc.
The one thing I can say is that conditions are no where near ideal for a movement like this to take hold on a national scale (hence, the smaller-scale alternatives). Obviously, there's no money right now; we can barely hold on to the teachers we have, much less find (and retain) teachers who are capable of leading "real learning" classrooms. Institutional change is very difficult even if there's the will to make the change happen (working with/against School Boards, parents, district administrators, teachers, etc.).
I can see certain communities embracing this new vision and there are reasons it works in certain communities: money, parental involvement, PTA support, home-life stability.
For other communities, rote learning is an accomplishment in and of itself. Kids come to school and their own survival is a priority, not the future of the planet. I don't doubt that these kids can flourish if they were able to concentrate on their studies; for many kids higher expectations can lead to higher achievement. Some may argue that these are precisely the communities that need a new and better vision for education, but to be realistic (pessimistic, even?) I don't see that happening as easily or as often as in wealthier communities.
This is an issue that people can go on and on about -- myself included -- and the conversations go on and on because there are so many issues intermingled with education.
My one hope is that the dialogue about education never dies; it must always be at the forefront of any country's concerns about the future.